Female sexuality is often defined in terms of what men want.
Sprout Pharmaceuticals is on the warpath. The pill company keeps applying, now for the third time, to authorize sales of a drug called flibanserin, which has been nicknamed “female Viagra,” but the FDA just keeps turning it down. Sprout would like you to believe it’s just another example of conservative forces shutting down technological advances that help women realize their sexual potential.
We’ve been down this road before, with attacks on legal abortion, contraception, and even laws banning vibrators for women. There’s no doubt that, despite all the advances women have made, there are still a lot of social obstacles preventing women from really enjoying their sexuality like they could. But in this case, the reality might be a lot more complicated.
Despite the “female Viagra” nickname, flibanserin actually is a very different drug from the pill that’s been the source of a billion jokes and nearly as many erections. Viagra is meant to help men who feel sexual desire but can’t get erect—often due to age or medical issues like prostate removal—get back in business. But most of what is called “female sexual dysfunction” isn’t about women who want to but can’t.
As Daniel Bergner wrote in his 2013 New York Times piece on this issue, “Lack of lust, when it creates emotional distress, meets the psychiatric profession’s clinical criteria for H.S.D.D., or hypoactive sexual-desire disorder.” Women who suffer from this “lack of lust” range from 10-30% of the population of women of reproductive age.
Flibanserin is meant to fix this issue, hitting the brain with a cocktail of psychological drugs that are supposed to make the reluctant woman want to do it again. The “again” is key here, because as Bergner pointed out, the funny thing about the HSDD diagnosis is that the cause in most cases appears to be environmental, not physical: HSDD affects monogamous women in long-term relationships. Couples get together, and at first, they’re hot for each other. But after years of being together, women are far more likely than men to see a dramatic drop-off in their interest in sex. “The impact of relationship duration is something that comes up constantly,” Lori Brotto, an expert on HSDD told Bergner. “Sometimes I wonder whether if it isn’t so much about libido as it is about boredom.”
It’s long been an article of faith among those who believe in “evolutionary psychology” that men are more promiscuous than women, but the blunt fact of the matter is the actual evidence on hand shows the opposite to be true. It’s women far more than men who seem to find the confines of marriage to be a boner-killer. The fact that most women do not experience this deep dive in desire after being with the same man for a few years suggests that the problem may not be monogamy itself; it may be that our culture just gives men a lot more of the tools they need to stay interested in having sex with the same woman over many years.
The problems start with how we define sexuality. Male sexuality is generally understood in terms of what men want from sex. Female sexuality is often defined in terms of what men want from sex. Men are encouraged from a young age to think about women’s bodies and what they would like to do to them, but women are encouraged to concentrate their efforts more on being desirable than on developing their own desires. You can see this clearly in the magazine market. “Men’s magazines are mostly based around heavily eroticized images of women,” Noah Berlatsky of the Atlantic writes. “And women’s magazines are also based around heavily eroticized images of women.”
It’s not just magazines. Go to any mainstream heterosexual porn site and you’ll see that most of the sexual fantasies on offer are meant for men, and the best women can hope for are sexual positions that don’t look too painful for the woman.
It also goes to grooming habits. Women are expected to flaunt their bodies, paint their faces, spend a fortune on hair care, shave off most body hair and even get plastic surgery if they fall short of what our society tells them men want. As Troy Patterson at Slate noted, we still live in an era where many men can barely be moved to reject ugly clothes “because they are worried about embarrassing their wives.” Getting them to dress to turn on their wives in this environment feels like moving a mountain.
Men are told to want and women are told to want to be wanted. And then we wonder why there are so many marriages where husbands do all the wanting and wives just want them to keep their hands to themselves.
But having this conversation is nearly impossible. A lot of men are already feeling emasculated by the rise of feminism. Having a national conversation about something as intimate about inequality in bed is going to make that defensive reaction deafening. Add to that the pressure put on women to do most of the heavy lifting when it comes to keeping relationships healthy. No wonder we’d rather just have a pill to fix the problem rather than ask why women have lingerie and Cosmo tips for keeping their partners interested and men do not.
The good news is that things do appear to be changing, if slowly. Sure, there was an attempt to shame men about “metrosexuality,” but only because the trend of straight men showing an actual interest in being sexy to women was taking off in the first place. Fifty Shades of Grey is causing a nationwide moral panic, but it’s also heartening to see that a movie that is all about appealing to women’s sexual fantasies is such a major hit in the first place.
And the Internet has been a treasure trove of reminders that women, like men, need a little fuel for their fires, with the explosion of women’s erotica boards and Tumblrs where women collect clippings of the most female-friendly parts of porn. Sex toys aimed at improving women’s experience in bed used to be taboo and even illegal in many states, but now they’re being sold in ordinary drugstores.
But still, there are many places in the U.S. where these expressions of female desire are considered shameful and are suppressed through social pressure and sometimes outright censorship. Even in more liberal places, women often struggle to express themselves and their desires on the same level as men. Perhaps, if this changes, we might see that a huge chunk of what is deemed “female sexual dysfunction” was just the predictable outcome of systematically understimulating women while hitting men with porn and titillating advertising everywhere they turn.
We can’t know until we try.
Amanda Marcotte co-writes the blog Pandagon. She is the author of “It’s a Jungle Out There: The Feminist Survival Guide to Politically Inhospitable Environments.”
This originally appeared on Alternet. Republished here with permission.